Brackenfell - 021 982 0965
  Eersteriver - 021 902 0246
property-logo

Clients for life.

This is FPS.

How to avoid misunderstandings about property in wills
Wills must be very carefully worded to avoid misunderstandings and misinterpretation, particularly when leaving property behind.

This is according to Willie Fourie, Head of Estate and Trust Services at PSG, who says the executor of the estate, heirs to the estate and the Master of the High Court of South Africa - who must confirm the validity of the will - often have conflicting views about a will’s provisions.

In these instances, Fourie says they look to the executor for a decisive interpretation of any contentious clauses.

Based on this interpretation, the assets within the estate are transferred to the heirs. While heirs may formally object to the executor’s interpretation, he says such challenges draw out and can complicate the settlement of the estate.

Fourie shares a few guidelines to consider when drafting a will:

  1. Avoid unclear property provisions


  2. “We recently came across a will where the interpretation of one of the clauses relating to the bequest of a residential property caused some doubt about the true intention of the estate owner,” says Fourie.

    When it comes to property, he says you can assign several different rights to heirs.

    “In our example, the executor’s decision would have resulted in either a usufruct or a fideicommissum being created,” he says.

    “A usufruct is a limited or temporary right to use and enjoy a property, but does not constitute full ownership of the property. A fideicommissum transfers property to another person on the condition that the property be passed on to someone else at a given time.”

    The clause in this particular will read as follows: ‘My parents shall have a life right to my residential property’.

    This clause seems fairly straightforward and unambiguous at first. The question that comes to mind, however, is what exactly the testator meant by a ‘life right’?

    Was it a limited real right to use the property, or did it mean that the parents would obtain ownership of the property?

  3. General interpretive rules


  4. To answer such questions, Fourie says three general rules and principles apply:

    The ‘plain meaning rule’ states that the contents of a will should be taken at face value, using strictly literal interpretations.

    The second rule of interpretation qualifies the ‘plain meaning rule’, stating that one must consider the testator’s intention in using particular words, and not merely the meanings of the words themselves. The reason for this is that wills are often drafted by laymen, who may not understand that particular words and phrases could have a particular technical meaning.

    A third important rule is to read the word or phrase that is contentious within the context of the overall will.

  5. Reading the phrase in the context of the will


  6. Continuing with our example above, Fourie says the following clause added to the confusion: 'My brother shall inherit my property after my parents’ death. He may, however, rent out or sell the property at their request if the money is needed for their maintenance or general wellbeing’.

    If the estate owner intended that a usufruct be created for her parents (without transferring ownership to them), her brother would become the legal owner of the property. He could then sell the property, but only subject to the rights of his parents’ usufruct.

    In the context of the will, Fourie says there are two indications that this is not what the estate owner had in mind:

    1. The wording of the will clearly states that the brother will only inherit the property after the parents’ death.

    2. The property may only be sold with the parents’ consent.

    This clearly points to the creation of a fideicommissum, where successive rights to the property are created as opposed to the simultaneous real rights the usufruct would create.

    Furthermore, there is a presumption in our law in favour of a fideicommissum over a usufruct. This is because a fideicommissum is less onerous than a usufruct.

  7. Always be clear when drafting your will


  8. “Use plain language to avoid ambiguous words and phrases so that your true intention is reflected in your will,” says Fourie.

    “Limit the use of legal terminology to an absolute minimum, and only to instances in which you or your will drafter have a thorough knowledge of the practical implications and legal consequences.”

    For qualified, professional assistance in ensuring that your will accurately reflects your final wishes, Fourie says you should consult a financial adviser who has specialist fiduciary expertise for guidance.
property-logo
icon
8A Gert Kotze Street,
Brackenfell,
Western Cape,
South Africa, 7560
icon
021 982 0965
icon
021 982 2509
property-logo
icon

23 A Plein Street,
Grand Central,
Eerste River,
Western Cape,
7100

icon

021 902 0246

icon
021 982 2509


ABOUT FPS PROPERTIES



Founded by Freddie P. Steyn in 2015, FPS Properties is one of the newest estate agencies in the Northern Suburbs of Cape Town. We are professional, dynamic and fully accredited estate agency. We strive to give all our clients professional and cost effective services to ensure that your property is rented or sold within the amount of time.

FPS Properties is supported by FPS Attorneys who will ensure that all transactions are correctly executed and furthermore will gladly assist with any and all legal queries to give you the added peace of mind.

Our agents are friendly and efficient and will gladly do free property valuations and provide sound property advice.

In short FPS Properties’ philosophy is simple… that by working closely with the client and becoming attuned to their business ethos, we can deliver pro-active and effective solutions thus creating ~ ”Clients for Life”

LEAVE US A MESSAGE